Sunday, March 17, 2013

Wheaters Part 6: Pappy 15, Jefferson's 18, and Vintage 17 Bourbon Review

Wheaters Finale: The Best 3 Wheaters Under $100?
Including, in my opinion, the best wheater at any price I've had.

Welcome to the last installment of this series on wheated bourbons. I have found, in drinking the spiritual heirs to Stizel-Weller that there are some very good whiskies in this segment, and that price does not always equal quality. I have also found the market to be a bit crowded with a number of expressions that I don't have a lot of time for. This is because, in my now reasonably extensive experience, wheaters really only become impressive after fairly protracted aging, around 12 years. I find wheated bourbons younger than this to be good, easy-drinking spirits, but I can't say that they offer much to my palate beyond standard low-rye bourbons. I think it is a shame to drink in their youth such bourbons as these will become in their age. I'm sure I will enrage OWA and Maker's die hards, but de gustibus non est disputandum.

I have also decided to finish the series here, with these three, and leave critical reviews of the Old Rip and OWA for another time. I'm getting a bit of wheater fatigue, and you too may be hoping I will move on. So, tasted neat (as I just really can't enjoy water in my bourbon unless it starts at over 50%):

Vintage Bourbon 17*
47% ABV Bottled by Kentucky Bourbon Distillers, $64.99
This prosaically named and hideously packaged bourbon was likely distilled at the Bernheim while it was owned by United Distillers. At this time, UD had just closed the S-W plant and were producing Old Fitzgerald and Weller products there (the plant would later be sold to Heaven Hill and the Weller brand to Sazerac). Some of the bourbons in the Van Winkle line have a proportion of this distillate as well. As such, this stuff has a pretty good pedigree (unfortunately, it seems to have been discontinued and, like many non-distiller labels, it is impossible to confirm any of this).

Nose: When poured into the fancy snifter I decided on today it fills the room with buttered apples. It smells like pie is about to happen.The nose also has some well-tamed alcohol, brown sugar, and no hint of acetone or other organic compounds.

Palate: The mouthfeel is weighty and smooth. The initial attack brings caramel, more buttered apple, pastry dough and a higher than average level of sweetness.

Finish: moderate length, very warming and pleasant. Apples and pears continue for some time, and no bitterness or real burn is detected. This one really asks you to have another sip.

Overall this is a very well-done effort. If it has a failing, it is somewhat simple and sweeter than average. However, with it's intense and pleasant flavor profile and very nicely integrated oak, the apple pie and sweetness thing makes this an exceptional desert bourbon and cognac alternative. I just wish I had more.

Jefferson's Presidential Select, 18 Years Old KSBW
Batch #27, 47% ABV, Bottled by McLain and Kyne, $89.99

Like the JPS17 that I had and loved last year, this bourbon was distilled in 1991 at the Stitzel-Weller distillery before it closed. Unusual for an independent bottler to tell us where the bourbon comes from, but in a world where kidneys are sold to get a bottle of Pappy, the S-W name sells. M&K do have a 21 year JPS coming out, but it looks unlikely to be from S-W or even wheater. But on to this one:

Nose:Wood. Woody, woody wood. Sort of nice wood, though, like walking into an antique shop in New England. Some incense, some cherries in there somewhere, vanilla and maybe a hint of milk chocolate. Orange zest too? All of the latter are initially overpowered by the wood, but as the wood blows off, they come to the forefront.

Palate: Again woody. There initial sweetness with vanilla and caramel, as well as faint cherry and maple, but it then feels like it dries up and  falls into a hole: the midpalate is full of dried grass, dried wheat and pencil shavings. There is also some bitterness toward the end.

Finish: The finish is long, but that nagging, grassy note dominates. Also pencil wood, citrus and some faint spices.

Overall, I'm finding this a lot less pleasant than the 17, as well as the last glass I had in a bar.  I suppose batch variation is a partial culprit, but I really think they left this guy in the barrel way too long. As I mentioned in a previous post, this stuff really comes alive with a few drops of Stagg, and I found the same with the addition of a few drops of Pappy 15. In both cases it was totally salvaged and really enjoyable. But I think $90 is too much to ask for a bourbon that needs "correcting." It is probably still worth trying, just to get some S-W into you, if you've never been exposed, and also worth seeking out if you can find a better batch than this one.

Pappy Van Winkle's Family Reserve, 15 Years Old KSBW
53.5% ABV, Bottled by Old Rip Van Winkle Distillery, $99.99

Pappy. Just saying the name makes liquor store owners shudder. As the most sought-after bourbon in the world, it's popularity at this point is based mostly on the fact that you cannot buy it anywhere. It used to come out twice a year, with the 15 year around $50-60; it's now down to every fall for $100 in many places, and we see it on Craigslist and (illegally) on Ebay for hundreds more than that. It's become the holy grail of bourbon hipsterdom and a great illustration of the fact that nothing makes people want something more than to be told they can't have it.

The 15 year was initially introduced as a line extension to the  original, 20 year-old Pappy (a 23 was also introduced), which I find more refined but less pleasurable at its lower proof. My one tasting of the 23 is lost in the mists of time. The bottle I have in front of me is likely a mixture of bourbons from Bernheim (like the V17), S-W (like the JPS18) and Buffalo Trace. Eventually it will (like the current Old Rip) be a 100% BT product.

Nose: When poured, the room again fills with the buttered apple aroma as with the Vintage 17. The oak is also there, more like the JPS and with the same antique-store and incense note. Cherries are also present as are caramel and vanilla. It is easy to smell what each of the Bernheim and S-W bourbons bring to this; harder to say with the BT, but their products are relatively neutral and 'clean' overall so this may not be surprising. This is a much better balanced nose than the JPS and more complex and interesting than the V17.

Palate: The attack is more aggressive here, likely due to the higher proof. There is butter, a touch of acetone, vanilla, brown sugar, dulce de leche,apples and a hint of coffee. The sweetness is medium and the body is huge.

Finish: the finish echoes the palate and, by virtue of the 53.5%, goes on for days. It is very warming and satisfying, leaving apples as a final note. There are no off notes and when the finish finally fades, the mouth feels clean.

I'd like to be contrarian and say that the PVW is more hype than substance, but I could honestly drink this stuff for days. It is really the platonic wheated bourbon and I can think of no way to improve upon it. It was the best value in the whiskey world when it was $60, and it remains well worth the $100. Why is it so good? I have a few ideas:
  • Vatting: in a market where single barrel automatically equals good, I think we can forget too easily the benefits of vatting.** Just as I found adding Stagg or Pappy to the JPS, using bourbons with slightly different profiles can often provide complexity and bolster weaknesses in a way that might not otherwise be possible. I think this is an approach that not used enough. As a caveat, though: I wish they would tell us when they did it and with what; there needs to be more transparency.
  • Proof: a given barrel of bourbon has all the flavor it's ever going to have. Adding water doesn't just cut down the alcohol. PVW15 has an extra 6.5% on the other guys, which is more than enough to make a difference.
  • Age and aging conditions: Given long enough in a barrel, I feel like all spirits tend toward "extra aged" in nose and taste. When done well, it's lovely, as in XO cognac, aged scotch, extra aƱejo tequila or Pappy 20, for that matter.  However, in the hot climate of Kentucky, it is easy to let a spirit age to far, resulting in the unpleasant woodiness we found in the JPS18. I think the Pappy 15 was dumped just as the barrels gave all they could, while preserving the qualities of the spirit that make it bourbon.

Conclusions
After all of these wheated bourbons, I will continue to buy Pappy 15, provided it doesn't reach much higher prices. I will also not turn down a Vintage 17 if I find it. I think I may well hoard a small amount of Weller 12, for when I'm in the mood for a wheater and it's not a special occaision, and I will also buy more of the Old Rip, which is supposed to be in better supply this fall. It'll be twice as expensive as OWA, but I think it's twice as good. I will probably not be buying any more Van Winkle 12 (lot B), any more OWA or WSR and will probably make my WLW decisions on a case-by-case basis. I am fortunate enough to have a hoard of Pappy and WLW that would see me through a medium-sized zombie apocalypse, so I think I will likely overall shift my money away from wheaters.

This leads me to a final thought. I love Pappy, and I really like most of the wheaters I've tasted. However, to my palate, only the PVW has held a candle to George Stagg, Van Winkle Rye, Sazerac 18, Hirsch 22, or special editions of Four Roses. I know I don't like wheaters as much as straight ryes, and I'm beginning to wonder about my feelings about them compared to high-rye bourbons... I guess that might be the next series to discuss.

If forced to rank-order and give scores to the wheaters I've had this year since  (with price as a consideration), I would rate them:

99/100 Pappy 15
94/100 Vintage 17, William Larue Weller
92/100 Weller 12
89/100 Van Winkle 12,
88/100 Jefferson's Presidential 18
79/100 Rebel Yell



*Note that older expressions of Vintage 17 were actually rye recipe bourbons
** I use Vatting, versus blending, as the latter connotes the blending of bourbon with inferior grain spirits as is "blended whiskey," aka bourbon flavored vodka.

15 comments:

  1. Ryan,

    On a mini dusty hunt today, I came across several bottles of JPS 17 year Batch 3. From what I have always read, most prefer (by a wide margin) the JPS 17 to the JPS 18. I currently have several Pappy's 15 and 20 that are open and consume on a montly basis. It appears that the JPS 17 is getting very hard to find in most area. Do you feel that brining in the JPS 17 would be a great addition (more based on quality than scarcity). They are asking $99 and currently have 5 bottles left (all dusty, LOL). Also, is there any varying on the bottle numbers? For instance, they are all Batch 3, but some are bottle #500 range and others are bottle #1900 range.


    Thanks in advance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi,
      I far prefer the 17 and have been kicking myself for not buying more. I only had the one bottle and it was pretty awesome. Sweeter and lower proof than the Pappy 15, but I felt it was comparable; lots of cherries and overall a perfect desert bourbon. The extra year in the barrel, I feel, mainly added wood/bitterness, and I like a lot of wood.

      I'm very jealous of your find and would buy what of it you can afford. $99 is a fair price (same as PVW15). It's S-W provenance makes it totally worth it in my opinion.

      I do not know anything about the bottle numbers, unfortunately. If you are anywhere near me and don't buy all 5, I certainly would not be offended by a hint as to their location...

      Delete
  2. Is Texas "near" you? If so, let me know and I will give you the exact coordinates. I am only going to pick up 1 for now, considering I might be served with divorce papers if I spent $500+ on five 750ml bottles. They have been sitting on the shelf now for 4+ years so I "hope" they will be there for the taking in the future.

    Also, they have several bottles of Booker's bourbon that are 8 years 2 months old and based on the bottle code they were barreled in 1996 and bottled in 2004. I thought that might be an intersting buy, considering that most Bookers that I see on the self now are only 6 years old and current vintages with bottle codes that indicate 2006 barrelings and 2012 bottlings. Do you know if the older Booker's with extra age are more desirable?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm going to be in Texas next week and would love to visit this store that you came across. Please tell me the name and location.
      Thank-you.

      Delete
    2. Hi i saw this site i have some bottles of whiskey an scotch rare old . contact me at Garliccity@hotmail.com . my name is Bob from California. Thanks

      Delete
  3. Since we are on the subject of Dusties, they also had WT American Spirit BOB 15 year. Is that a no brainer to pick up for $79? Also, I noticed all of their Elmer t. Lee bottles were topped with gold wax. I haven't seen that before. Can those bottles be dated?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the AS is a no brainer. ETL with wax was the prior version and they switched around 2005 AFAIK. Some have noted a decline in quality since, but as a single barrel product it's hard to be sure. If it is the rare 15year I'd snap it up, otherwise I think it's pretty likely to be similar.

      Delete
  4. Do you remember the batch # you had for your JPS 17?

    Josh

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Josh,
      I can't remember. It was my friend's bottle in fact. I thought he sent along the info, but I can't find the email. I'll ask him, but we killed it a while back so it may be lost. Thanks for reading

      Delete
  5. Hey Ryan,

    I ended up picking up 1 bottle of the JPS 17 batch 3 and wasted no time opening it the other night to do a quick comparison/side by side with Pappy 15. If it came close I was going to go back and get a few more bottles as the bottle #'s were consecutive so there should be little to no variation in the taste.

    Keep in mind, in my comparison, the Pappy 15 has been opened for about 3 months and 2/3 full while the JPS was the first pour from a new bottle.

    I thought the Pappy 15 was far superior on every level. The nose, mouthful, finish were all ramped up about 2 notches IMO compared to the JPS 17. If I could never find/buy/acuquire Pappy and wanted to try an old S-W wheater, the JPS would work for sure. I actually thought the JPS 17 resembled the Papppy 20 much more than the Pappy 15. Maybe the difference in proof is the reason? I wonder if the JPS will get better/open up with additional air time? I know people have said not to judge based on the first or second pour, so I am hoping my opinion changes. Maybe I was just expecting perfection, but was let down just a bit since I have been fortunate to sip on all of the BTAC and Pappy's in the past.

    Anyways, I will take another pull within the next week, as I don't want to end up loving it a year from now and my honey hole become empty. When I picked up this bottle, there was another person there eyeing the JPS 17 as well...

    Josh

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Josh,
      I found the 17 (I don't recall the batch # as I was not quite as obsessed at that point), to be sweeter and more dessert-like than the PVW 15, which I had open at the same time. I think that the proof may have been a large part of the difference. I liked them about equally well, though the PVW has a better nose. I think it got better with time and in any case, unless you are hard up for cash right now I would think about buying all the fairly-priced 17 you can find, as I think it was much better than most examples of the 18 I've tried. If you are a little light, then don't worry, there will always be something interesting to drink.

      Delete
  6. Why in the world doesn't Heavean Hill put out a 15 year 107 proof to calm the Pappy craze?!? They have got to have wheater stock close to 15 years old considering that they have had Old Fitz before 2000 and they were able to produce an 11 year wheater for Parkers 2010 and used it again with the blend of mashbills in 2012. And you know they could offer it at a competitive price (sub $75).

    Just saying...

    Maybe it's just the the WLW talking that I sipped on tonight...Good stuff

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've often wondered the same myself. I think all the DSP-KY-1 wheater went into Pappy and V17. They've only had the new place up and running since 2000, so a 15 year is still a bit off. I wonder if their stocks are low, as I rarely see the 12 year Fitz, but maybe they are holding on to it just to release it at 15? We can hope.

      Delete
  7. What is the name of the place in TX that had the Jefferson 17 for $99. You can email it to me at downthehatch00 at ya hoo dot com. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anybody have any leads on Vintage 17...

    I know it's a long shot, but, one can hope.

    Thanks. chrismagnuson at gmail

    ReplyDelete